Unclear on the concept

I had picked up a magazine called Good at the airport on the way home last week. It was kind of a mixed bag of social activism with what I suspected was some hard case conservative hatemongering depending on the article. One was this article on religious leaders trying to preach politics from the pulpit AND still keep their tax exempt status. I don't see this as a good thing.

In the letters I also saw that their first issue had an interview with Chris Simcox, the leader of the racist vigilante group, the Minuteman Project. This, too, is not what you'd classify as an act of good. Unless you consider being forced to take demeaning and possibly human rights abuse type photos in order to get a bottle of water from a redneck a good thing.

The "geniuses" behind this must be the same evil punks behind the Clear Skies Act, Healthy Forests Act, No Child Left Behind and "compassionate conservatism." Things that sound good on paper as long as you don't read the details.

So, money wasted on one issue, but no plans to ever give this piece of bum wipe my time or money ever again.

Also clueless: the Bush administration.

Not that this is news, but here's the latest. Tony Snow, the FAUXNews-anchor-turned-Bush-mouthpiece, says, "I'm not sure anything went wrong in Iraq." So you planned for over 3,000 dead troops, hundreds of thousands Iraqi dead, and a civil war?