Fine, okay, it's a blog already!

I have a couple problems here. One is obvious. How can you be "pro-life" while resorting to assassination as an argument tactic? And yes, some folks are justifiably calling it fundamentalist terrorism. So, really, how do you reconcile the belief system to the behavior?

More important to me, even in my current "spiritual without particular religion" phase, is the concept of holy ground. Sanctuary. Gangs respect it (for the most part). The Families swear by it. Even the KGB respected the tradition. Why don't Talibangelicals? Last year, that one asshat shot up a church in Tennessee to kill some token Democrats. Now, a doctor gets shot in church.

Not *near* the church. Not pacing outside the church deciding whether or not he could enter. He was *in* church. As an usher in said church. An active participant in the worship of God.

But these so-called "compassionate conservatives" think it is okay to enter a church with a gun and assassinate someone. And why not? They want you to have guns in national parks. They want you to pack heat in school. Why WOULDN'T they agree to execution by the pipe organ?

These twits do not respect any opinions that aren't on par with their own narrow minded view. Zealots. Racists. Bigots. Assassins. Terrorists.

When will someone tell these fools that this is not religion. It is only hate. It sure won't be FauxNews. Here's their opinions on these matters:

More on this filthbucket O'Reilly and his friends here, , < href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200906010025" target="_blank">and here.

Another doctor dares to call this terrorism.

And Rethug Goon Randall Terry says we shouldn't over-react in placing the blame where it belongs. Namely, with people like him.

So yeah, I'll be more on the lookout for places that air FauxNews and to avoid giving them any business. If you want to air hate, you don't need my money. Probably racists anyway.